Utilitarianism And Euthanasia

Utilitarianism and Euthanasia

Patients and medical personnel that seek to use of triage are categorizing the patients accordingly but are keeping in mind the available us of limited medical resources. The principle of utility remains in regards to which the benefits are to be maximized.

In the triage system, medicals personnel seek to accomplish the health benefit of saving the most lives. To maximize the chosen benefits, the triage system may dictate treatment right away for some while delaying care for others.

In utilitarianism, bad consequences may be acceptable if the action produces the greatest overall benefits.]

Utilitarianism and Euthanasia - especial. remarkable

In this case, killing the person Would seem to be the most humane and reasonable thing to do, whereas keeping the person alive would be akin to torture; which is also presumed to be a fundamental evil act. But euthanasia, in essence, is murder, and this might lead one to ask whether there can ever be an exception to murder? And if one were to make an exception in this case, what would then prevent us from making exceptions in other cases? In the worst case scenario, would his not leave an opening for cold-blooded murders to kill people without their consent, and make false claims that they did have their consent? According to Utilitarianism, euthanasia can be morally justified, whereas according to Kantian, euthanasia is not morally justifiable; but will argue that neither position provides an adage Tate resolution to the issue, due to the significant flaws that are inherent in the reasoning that led to their particular positions. According to Utilitarianism, ethics is primarily an empirical science; essentially implying that the moral standard must be based on human experiences, and not abstract principles that are largely impractical. Utilitarianism and Euthanasia.