The Legal Laws Regulation Bill 2011

Legislative Bill/Resolution

Nyamu December 18, The High Court has nullified the award of a tender for the printing of self adhesive excise stamps for wines and spirits after it found that the Kenya Revenue Authority and the Public Procurement Administrative Review Board had misinterpreted and misapplied the Public Procurement and Disposal Act, in disqualifying a bid by De La Rue Company.

The closing date for the tender was 26th March and the opening of the financial bids took place on 2nd May The Legal Laws Regulation Bill 2011 the Kenya Revenue Authority was notified that it had lost the bid through a letter dated July 15,De La Rue had filed a complaint before the Review Board asking it to review KRA's decision on two main grounds: firstly, that KRA had misapplied the law by excluding De La Rue from the benefit of a clause in the Public Procurement Regulations that gave preference to Walt Whitman And Romanticism offering goods manufactured in Kenya.

Secondly, De La Rue complained that the evaluation of the tender had taken a period of more than 30 days which was in contravention of section 66 6 of the Public Procurement and Disposal Act, Under regulation 28 1 of the Public Procurement Regulations, the threshold below which exclusive preference shall be given to citizens of Kenya shall be Kshs. However, there was a second class of preference https://modernalternativemama.com/wp-content/custom/argumentative-essay/the-scarlet-letter-essay-introduction.php had nothing to do with citizenship and which, as it turned out, the Review Board had ignored. Section 39 8 b of the Act provides that a prescribed margin of preference may be given in evaluation of bids to candidates offering goods manufactured, mined, extracted and grown in Kenya. In the Board's understanding, EPZ goods are regarded The Legal Laws Regulation Bill 2011 being outside the customs territory in so far as import duty and taxes are concerned.

Although the Review Board conceded that it had violated the provisions of section 66 6 of the Act in awarding the tender outside the stipulated period of 30 days, it argued that De La Rue had not suffered any prejudice on the account of the delay.

The proceedings were presided over by Justice J. According to the Court, the fact The Legal Laws Regulation Bill 2011 the goods have an EPZ origin https://modernalternativemama.com/wp-content/custom/personal-statement/voluntary-turnover.php only relevant for the purpose of computing import duties and taxes and other benefits provided under the EPZ Act. For all other purposes, any such goods should be taken to have been manufactured in a designated part of Kenya and they cannot be regarded as foreign goods.

The other difference is that internally, such goods are restricted and they attract different duties and taxes which any bidder would have to pay even if the tender was to be awarded locally.

This, however, should not disadvantage such a tenderer in terms of margins of preference based on local manufacture. The Court did not think that the term 'import' as specially used in the EPZ Act should be applied to a general situation where goods manufactured The Legal Laws Regulation Bill 2011 an EPZ Zone in Kenya are regarded as imports for the purposes of the Procurement and Disposal Act.

As Justice Nyamu put it The Legal Laws Regulation Bill 2011 his judgment, "[I]t would be irrational to regard Kenyan territory as foreign country except for the special meaning in the EPZ Act for purposes of duty and taxes". When the Court read regulation 28 2 together with section 39 8 b i of the Act, it was clear to it that this category of margin of preference is applied to goods manufactured in Kenya whereas the Review Board's decision was on the mistaken basis that any preference can only be to a Kenyan citizen and only in cases below the minimum threshold of Kshs.

The Court did not think that this category of preference had anything to do with citizenship. The Review Board had wrongly concluded that because the tender was above the prescribed threshold reserved for citizens, then the KRA was entitled to ignore the issue of the second margin of preference which related to the place where the goods were manufactured.

In any case, Justice Nyamu further observed, the origin of the goods to be supplied by De La Rue was clearly set out in the technical documentation which formed part of its tender. De La Rue's financial bid clearly demonstrated it was a Kenyan company producing goods in Kenya and with a manufacturing capability at its Ruaraka factory. The Review Board had therefore failed to distinguish the two categories of statutory margins of preferences, namely the exclusive preference The Legal Laws Regulation Bill 2011 to Kenyan citizens upon which the board proceeded to make its holdings and a margin of preference for goods manufactured in Kenya set out in section 39 8 b i and Regulation 28 2 a which the Board did not address at all.

The Judge found that the second category of preference which the KRA and the Review Board click ignored was a relevant consideration and also part of the substantive law on procurement. They had both overlooked important factual matters because the establishment of the origin of the goods and their place of manufacture were important precedent facts to the application of the correct margin of preference. The misinterpretation or misdirection of the law on the application of the margin of preference and the origin of goods, in the view of the court, led the KRA and the Review Board to fail to take relevant factors into consideration and on that basis, the judicial review court had a basis for interfering with the decision.

On De La Rue's complaint about the time that KRA had taken in evaluating the bids, Justice Nyamu recalled that section 66 6 of the Act provided in very clear terms that an evaluation "shall be carried out within such period as may be prescribed".

Because the regulations made under the Act provided for a period of 30 days, it followed that the Regulation and had a The Legal Laws Regulation Bill 2011 underpinning. The time restriction on the evaluation of tenders was intended as a safeguard to prevent abuses in the procurement process.

Read eBook Full Page in PDF

The provision was stated in mandatory terms and was also clearly aimed at achieving both efficiency and transparency in procurement procedures. The Court was therefore of the view that the Review Board was wrong in failing to direct its mind to the compelling question of why the evaluation of the bids had taken a period longer than the one provided by statute. Moreover, KRA's notification to De La Rue that it's bid had not been successful was given outside the period provided by law.

The Court therefore allowed De La Rue's motion for judicial review of the Review Board's decision and granted it five orders: the The Legal Laws Regulation Bill 2011 of the Review Board dismissing De La Rue's request for review and directing the KRA to proceed with the tender process was quashed; KRA's decision to award the tender to Madras Security Printer's Ltd was nullified; KRA was restrained from entering into any contract in furtherance of the tender award to Madras Security and finally, KRA was directed to evaluate the tender afresh and in accordance with the law.]

Business your: The Legal Laws Regulation Bill 2011

PERSONAL REFLECTIVE ESSAY: ADAPTING TO AMERICA	3 days ago · Christopher Meloni finally reveals why he quit Law & Order: SVU back in Meloni now stars in Law & Order: Organized Crime, which is the latest addition to the Dick Wolf Law & Order franchise, from the long-running Law & Order: Special Victims Unit. The spinoff just wrapped its first season, featuring the return of Detective Elliot Stabler to NYPD after a decade-long absence and . As of 11 April , it was illegal to wear a face covering veil or other masks in public spaces. Veils, scarves and other headwear that do not cover the face are unaffected by this law. The law imposes a fine of up to €, and/or participation in citizenship education, for those who violate the law. 17 hours ago · The Kenya Law Reports Weekly Newsletter \| LEGAL BRIEF \| Issue \| Tuesday 30, December
The Legal Laws Regulation Bill 2011	3 days ago · Christopher Meloni finally reveals why he quit Law & Order: SVU back in Meloni now stars in Law & Order: Organized Crime, which is the latest addition to the Dick Wolf Law & Order franchise, from the long-running Law & Order: Special Victims Unit. The spinoff just wrapped its first season, featuring the return of Detective Elliot Stabler to NYPD after a decade-long absence and . Constitution, Jefferson's Manual, and the Rules of the House of Representatives, th Congress, H. Doc. INVEST in America Act, H.R. \| H. Rept. For the People Act of , H.R. 1 \| For the People Act of , S. 1. Relief Bills and Other COVID Related Documents. 17 hours ago · The Kenya Law Reports Weekly Newsletter \| LEGAL BRIEF \| Issue \| Tuesday 30, December
PERSONAL NARRATIVE DEATH OF A MILKMAN	Comparing Sherman Alexies Superman And Me
Movie Analysis: Wonder Woman	734

The Legal Laws Regulation Bill 2011 Video

Legal Services Regulation Bill 2011, Committee Stage, Part 5

The Legal Laws Regulation Bill 2011 - opinion

The International Criminal Court is a controversial and important body within international law; one that is significantly growing in importance, particularly as other international criminal tribunals close down. After a decade of Court practice, this book takes stock of the activities of the International Criminal Court, identifying the key issues in need of re-thinking or potential reform. It provides a systematic and in-depth thematic account of the law and practice of the Court, including its changes context, the challenges it faces, and its overall contribution to international criminal law. The book is written by over forty leading practitioners and scholars from both inside and outside the Court. They provide an unparallelled insight into the Court as an institution, its jurisprudence, the impact of its activities, and its future development. The work addresses the ways in which the practice of the International Criminal Court has emerged, and identifies ways in which this practice could be refined or improved in future cases. The book is organised along six key themes: i the context of International Criminal Court investigations and prosecutions; ii the relationship of the Court to domestic jurisdictions; iii prosecutorial policy and practice; iv the applicable law; v fairness and expeditiousness of proceedings; and vi its impact and lessons learned. It shows the ways in which the Court has offered fresh perspectives on the theorization and conception of crimes, charges and individual criminal responsibility. The Legal Laws Regulation Bill 2011.

2022-03-03

654

COMMENTS0 comments (view all)

ADD COMMENTS