Racial Profiling And The American Civil Liberties

It has been suggested that this section be split out into another article titled Racial profiling in the United States. Discuss November According to the American Civil Liberties Union ACLU : 'Racial profiling' refers to the practice by law enforcement officials of targeting individuals for suspicion of crime based on the individual's race, ethnicity, religion or national origin. Criminal profiling, generally, as practiced by police, is the reliance on a group of characteristics they believe to be associated with crime which unfortunately leads to innocent people dying.

Examples of racial profiling are the use of race to determine which drivers to stop for minor traffic violations commonly referred click as 'driving while black, Asian, Native American, Middle Eastern, Hispanic, or brown'or the use of race to determine which pedestrians to search for illegal contraband. Under the broader definition, racial profiling occurs whenever police routinely use race as a factor that, along with an accumulation of other factors, causes an officer to react with suspicion and take action.

InPhiladelphia's court officials gave police legal authority to stop and detain any Black person freed or enslaved seen wandering about. Supreme Court cases[ edit ] Terry v.

Ohio was the first challenge to racial profiling in the United States in This case was about African American people who were suspected to be stealing. Terry one of the three men searched was convicted and sentenced to jail. This case resulted in the creation of the Terry stopin which the police may stop a person based on reasonable suspicion of involvement in criminal activity.

Brignoni-Ponce was decided. Felix Humberto Brignoni-Ponce was traveling in his vehicle and was stopped by border patrol agents because he appeared to be Mexican.

Supreme Court ruled in United States v. Armstrong that disparity in conviction rates is not unconstitutional in the absence of data that "similarly situated" defendants of another race were disparately prosecuted, [74] [75] overturning a 9th Circuit Court ruling that was based on "the presumption that people of all races commit all types of crimes — not with the premise that any type of crime is the exclusive province of any particular racial or ethnic group", waving away [76] challenges based on the Fourth Amendment of the U.

Constitution which guarantees the right to be safe from search and seizure without a warrant which is to be issued "upon probable cause"and the Fourteenth Amendment which requires that all citizens be treated equally under the law.

No comments

To date, there have been no known cases in which any U. This Supreme Court decision doesn't prohibit government agencies from enacting policies prohibiting it in the field by agents and employees. The Supreme Court also decided the case of Whren v. United States in Michael Whren was arrested on felony drug charges after police officers observed his truck sitting at an intersection for a long period of time before he failed to use his turn signal to drive away, and the officers stopped his vehicle for the traffic violation.]

Racial Profiling And The American Civil Liberties - charming message

And, an overwhelming number of people being stopped by border agents have status. The report details one disturbing incident in particular, when U. For a moment it appeared they would be allowed to continue on, until an officer noted their accents and said that a colleague was nearby with a border agent. The report said that Gomez watched the interaction in terror, fearful that their two U. Ultimately, they were allowed to leave. Then they called Border Patrol right away. Everything that happened to us was wrong. We were being targeted just because we are brown. Thank You For Sharing Your Concerns.