General Franco Led What Kind Of Revolution In Spain

General franco led what kind of revolution in spain

At the helm were military leaders such as General Francisco Franco, who were conservatives in all essential respects. When the civil war ended, Franco was so deeply entrenched that the Falange stood no chance; in this strongly authoritarian regime, there was no room for political opposition.

Spanish Civil War (Non-Intervention) Bill, 1937—Second Stage (Resumed).

The Falange became junior partners in the government and, as such, they had to accept responsibility for the regime's policy without being able to shape it substantially". This party, often referred to as Falange, became the sole legal party during Franco's regime, but the term "party" was generally avoided, especially after World War II, when it was commonly referred to as the "National Movement" or just read article "the Movement". Fascism and Authoritarianism[ edit ] The main point of those scholars that tend to consider the Spanish State to be authoritarian rather than fascist is that the FET-JONS were relatively heterogeneous rather than being an ideological monolith. Franco was also the focus of a personality cultwhich taught that he had been sent by Divine Providence to save the country from chaos and poverty.

University students seeking democracy revolted in the late s and early s, which was repressed by the grises. Like others at the time, Franco evinced a concern about a possible Masonic and Judaic conspiracy against his regime. Franco continued to personally sign all death warrants until just months before he died despite international campaigns requesting him to desist.

Bullfighting and flamenco [37] were promoted as national traditions, while those traditions not considered Spanish were suppressed. Franco's view of Spanish tradition was somewhat artificial and arbitrary: while some regional traditions were suppressed, Flamenco, an Andalusian tradition, was considered part of a larger, national identity.

All cultural activities were subject to censorship and many were forbidden entirely, often in an erratic manner. This cultural policy relaxed over time, most notably in the late s and early s.

Franco was reluctant to enact any form of administrative and legislative decentralisation and kept a fully centralised form of government with a similar administrative structure to that established by the House of Bourbon and General Miguel Primo de Rivera. These structures were modelled after the centralised French state. As a result of this type of governance, government attention and initiatives were irregular and often depended more on the goodwill of government representatives than on regional needs.

Thus inequalities in schooling, health care or transport facilities among regions were patent: historically affluent regions like MadridCatalonia or the Basque Country fared much better than others such as ExtremaduraGalicia or Andalusia. Falangist celebration in Franco eliminated the autonomy granted by the Second Spanish Republic to the regions and abolished the centuries-old fiscal privileges and autonomy the fueros in two of the three Basque provinces: Guipuzcoa and Biscaywhich were officially classified as "traitor regions". The fueros were kept in the third Basque province, Alavaand also in Navarrea former kingdom during the Middle Ages and the cradle of the Carlists, possibly due to the region's support during the Civil War.

Franco also used language politics in an attempt to establish national homogeneity. Despite Franco himself being Galician, the government revoked the official statute and recognition for the BasqueGalician and Catalan languages that the Republic had granted them for the first time in the history of Spain. The former policy of promoting Spanish as the only official language of the state and education was resumed, even though millions of the country's citizens spoke other languages. The legal usage of languages other than Spanish was forbidden: all government, notarial, legal and commercial documents were to be drawn up exclusively in Spanish and any written in learn more here languages were deemed null and void.

The use of any other language was forbidden in schools, advertising, religious ceremonies and on-road general franco led what kind of revolution in spain shop signs.

Publications in other languages were generally forbidden, though citizens continued to use them privately. During the late s, these policies became more lenient yet non-Castilian languages continued to be discouraged and did not receive official status or legal recognition. Additionally, the popularisation of the compulsory national educational system and the development of modern mass media, both controlled by the general franco led what kind of revolution in spain and exclusively in Spanish, reduced the competency of speakers of Basque, Catalan and Galician.

Roman Catholicism[ edit ] Although Franco himself was previously known for not being very devout, [38] his regime often used religion as a means to increase its popularity throughout the Catholic world, especially after the Second World War. Franco himself was increasingly portrayed as a fervent Catholic and a staunch defender of Roman Catholicism, the declared state religion. The regime favoured very conservative Roman Catholicism and it reversed the secularisation process that had taken place under the Republic.

According to historian Julian Casanova"the symbiosis of religion, fatherland and Caudillo" saw the Church assume great political responsibilities, "a hegemony and monopoly beyond its wildest dreams" and it played "a central role in policing the country's citizens".]

General franco led what kind of revolution in spain Video

Ten Minute History - The Spanish Civil War and Francisco Franco (Short Documentary)

General franco led what kind of revolution in spain - understand

Share My compliment to the President was premature. He moved the guillotine motion and is proceeding to get this Bill passed to-day. It was all camouflage saying that the Second Stage only was wanted to-day. When introducing the Bill yesterday he said that he only wanted the Second Reading passed. It is fairly obvious that when he gets the Second Reading to-day he will substantially get the Bill. He can do presumably what he wants to do. He can do what has been prompted should be done by Deputy MacDermot. It has been stated that the Bill is urgent. It has also been stated that the question of recognising Governments in Spain does not arise. general franco led what kind of revolution in spain.