AD

Fetal Ultrasound: Risks, Benefits, and Alternatives (Part II)

sarah October 13, 2015

 

part2

Image by Compfight

 

Part I of this series briefly explained the process of fetal ultrasound scanning and examined the potential risks identified to date. Part II will summarize potential benefits which may outweigh those risks in certain circumstances, and present several alternatives providing much of the information sought in routine scans.

 

What are the Potential Benefits of Fetal Ultrasound?

 

Critical Diagnostic Information in Special Circumstances

Ultrasound can provide detailed information during crucial stages of pregnancy when, in very rare cases, early intervention provides long-term benefit. Diagnostic information has demonstrably improved outcomes in the following specific circumstances:

–  Confirming diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy

–  Turning a baby in breech position via external version

–  Evaluation during amniocentesis or fetal blood transfusion

Other Improved Outcomes Are Rare

Many pregnant mothers and healthcare providers assume that early diagnosis of any serious condition automatically improves the outcome for mothers and infants. Interestingly, this is not usually the case even for severe complications. For instance, a Norwegian study found that in babies with abdominal wall defects, the diagnosed group of babies received surgery hours before the undiagnosed group,  but the results for both groups were identical, with no mortalities.

Ultrasound detection of serious birth defects varies widely in accuracy, ranging from 13-85%, and false positive diagnoses are not uncommon. While certain rare conditions such as sacrococcygeal tumor, bladder obstructions, and twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome may now be treated with prenatal surgery,  these procedures are sporadically available and risky – as of 2012, prenatal surgery presented a 50% mortality risk. Ultimately, early and accurate detection leading to drastic interventions for these conditions did not statistically improve outcomes. These findings suggest that the powerful benefits of uncomplicated vaginal delivery as well as bonding, skin-to-skin contact, and breastfeeding immediately after birth may offset delays in diagnosis and treatment of even the most profoundly serious conditions.

In fact, two broad-based and widely referenced studies have been conducted to evaluate the impact of fetal ultrasound in overall outcomes. In 1993 and again in 2010, researchers found that routine fetal ultrasound failed to provide substantial benefit to mothers and babies.

What are the Alternatives to Ultrasound?

Pregnant women concerned about the potential risks of ultrasound may still want the reassurance of information traditionally provided by routine scanning.

Women at risk for early miscarriage might choose fertility charting, and specifically tracking their basal body temperature, to assess whether a miscarriage is imminent during the first weeks of pregnancy.

Expectant mothers compelled to know the sex of their fetus or identify possible chromosomal abnormalities now may do so in the first trimester with only a blood draw, as relatively new tests are sensitive enough to detect fetal DNA in a maternal blood sample with about 98% accuracy.

Skilled midwives and other healthcare practitioners are trained to use non-invasive procedures and tools, such as the pinard horn for use in monitoring fetal heart rate. Measurement of fundal height is as effective as ultrasound in monitoring normal fetal growth rate throughout pregnancy, and experienced practitioners can very accurately determine fetal position during the third trimester of pregnancy.

Conclusion

The decision to undergo one or more ultrasound scans belongs with pregnant mothers and their partners. While routine scanning is often presented by healthcare providers as the predominant standard of prenatal care, no significant evidence indicates that these scans are necessarily beneficial – and a growing body of evidence indicates potential risks. Every pregnant mother has the right to accept or refuse the procedure whenever it is recommended, and she should be fully informed of risks and alternatives.

When providers recommend medical ultrasound scans for pregnant patients, those recommendations should be based on concrete evidence that the diagnosis sought via ultrasound has demonstrably improved outcomes – and patients should feel perfectly comfortable asking for that evidence when scans are suggested. Ultimately it is the expectant mother who must live with the consequences, either positive or negative, of every procedure and resulting intervention she receives – and no one is more invested in the health and well-being of her baby.

 

What Are Your Thoughts On Fetal Ultrasound?

 

Confused about vaccines?

Vaccine guide ck

Get our FREE no-nonsense vaccine guide. Answer your questions with rational, fact-based information instead of fear.

This is the writings of:

sarah
AD
  1. I had complete placenta previa with my first so in my case I was thinking I’ll probably get a QUICK (not the 20 min thing) around 20 weeks to see where the placenta is. I also had a miscarriage before her at 18 weeks, and I wish I had gotten an ultrasound to see him alive, but I didn’t want one early on 🙁

    Reply

  2. […] edge alternatives which provide much of the information traditionally sought via fetal ultrasound. Part II of this series will examine those in […]

    Reply

  3. Two boy babies died of the same genetic heart defect in my husbands family, so I am glad that with both my boys I had an ultrasound to see if their hearts were formed properly so that they could have the necessary doctors on hand. Both my sons did not have the birth defect.

    Reply

  4. Thank you so much for this! It really reaffirms and reassures me that my decision to avoid ultrasounds this pregnancy are not only valid, but also not irresponsible. I have had two missed miscarriages – both stopped growing between 6 and 7 weeks, and discovered both at my first prenatal ultrasounds at 8 & 9 weeks, so there is part of me that says “shouldn’t we at least make sure this one is where it’s supposed to be and growing?”, but I feel much better now about finding a good, skilled midwife so we can avoid unnecessary affects on baby, and still monitor things appropriately.

    Reply

  5. My wife recently found out that she’s pregnant. We want to make sure she and the baby are safe, so we’re looking at different imaging options. I never realized new ultrasound systems can more accurately detect birth defects. I’ll pass this info along to my wife.

    Reply

  6. I just had a missed miscarriage at 6 wks and they showed baby stopped growing 2 days after my first vaginal ultrasound. In my heart I know that is what caused it bc all blood work and 1st scan proved an awesomely healthy baby. I have also done research and finding that so many women are being misdiagnosed with missed miscarriage bc they failed to hear fetal heartbeat when a followup showed a healthy baby with beating heart. I’m very confused, heartbroken and feel unfortunate not to have been privy to the risks and possible alternatives. I’d like to know where I can find info on midwives and alternative care, hopefully for the next time. Thank you.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

I’m Kate, mama to 5 and wife to Ben.  I love meeting new people and hearing their stories.  I’m also a big fan of “fancy” drinks (anything but plain water counts as ‘fancy’ in my world!) and I can’t stop myself from DIY-ing everything.  I sure hope you’ll stick around so I can get to know you better!

Meet My Family
Top
Confused about vaccines? Grab our FREE Vaccine Guide for real, science-based answers.